Tag: home listings

Posted on

Newsletter: Is the SF Market Easing a Little?

Is the Ferocious SF Market Easing a Little?

October 2012 San Francisco Market Update

September brought a burst of new inventory that helped satisfy some of the fierce buyer demand for San Francisco homes. Anecdotally, word on the street is that the market may have calmed down a little after Labor Day: not every listing is selling immediately amid high numbers of competing offers — though this may simply reflect the temporary increase in new listings, or sellers too hopeful in their asking prices. But it also appears that home price appreciation has been stabilizing or at least slowing in the last quarter after the big jump earlier in the year. It’s still too early for conclusions: Since most statistics are like looking in a rearview mirror, what is happening today will only become clear in coming months.

Even if the market has eased a little, it is still very strong and very competitive by any historical measure.

Below are 2 updated, mapped analyses of median sales prices and average dollar per square foot values. Almost all the current values reflect a significant jump from 2011: for the city overall, the increase has been in the 10 to 12% range, but it can vary from 4% to 18% by neighborhood and property type.

Median Sales Prices

After the big jump early in the year, median price appreciation for both house and condos appear to have stabilized or slowed – at least for the city as a whole. (Market conditions vary widely by neighborhood.) The median sales price for non-distressed SF condos now slightly exceeds the median price in 2007, the last peak of the market, while that of SF houses is only 5% below 2007. We have similar charts going back 15 to 30 years available on our website.

Inventory

September had the highest number of new listings of any month in the past year, though well below previous Septembers: 760 new home listings in September 2012 vs. 888 in 2011 and 1138 in 2010. This significantly, if temporarily, expanded the choice of homes available to buyers. But now, in October, the number of new listings is dwindling again and inventory is still drastically low by any historical measure. Overall, in the third quarter, there were 1100 fewer listings than in the same period last year, but the number of sales increased by 21%.

2-Bedroom Condo Median Prices

In the 5 areas shown, condo values jumped across the board, though the most dramatic increase from the bottom of the market has been in South Beach/Yerba Buena — where in the last 2 quarters, the median price surged ahead of that for Pacific and Presidio Heights. Noe and Eureka Valleys and surrounding neighborhoods, SoMa and Hayes Valley/NoPa have also seen large increases. If you’d like data on a neighborhood not listed, please let us know.

Average Dollar per Square Foot House Values

Though pretty much all SF neighborhoods are seeing increases in dollar per square foot values for houses, the more affluent districts 5 (Noe/Eureka/Cole Valleys) and 7 (Pacific Heights-Marina) have seen some of the largest jumps. In the last 2 quarters, District 5 hit a point matching the peak of the market in 2007. If you’d like data on a neighborhood not listed, please let us know.

Luxury Home Sales

Comparing the 3rd Quarter 2012 with 3rd Quarter 2011, MLS listings of San Francisco homes of $1,500,000 and above increased by 23% and sales soared by 54%. This map shows where those sales occurred: 18 in the Sea Cliff/ Lake Street/ Richmond district; 26 in the Pacific Heights/ Marina district; 21 in Russian/ Nob/ Telegraph Hills; 19 in the greater SoMa/South Beach area; 53 in the Noe/ Eureka/ Cole Valleys district; 10 in the St. Francis Wood/ Forest Hill district; 2 in Potrero Hill and 3 in Bernal Heights. The highest prices are still generally achieved in the band of very affluent neighborhoods running across the northern boundary of the city, though growth in the number of luxury home sales is strongest in the central and northeastern areas.

Months Supply of Inventory (MSI)

Still bumping along at the lowest levels in memory. MSI reflects the amount of time it would take to sell the current inventory of homes for sale at the existing rate of sales. Lower MSI means higher demand as compared to supply.

Percentage of Listings Accepting Offers

Houses, condos and TICs all hit historic highs in the 54% to 60% range earlier in the year, but have now fallen back a bit. In the third quarter, TICs saw a rather large decrease, but their percentage is still much higher than in the last four calendar years. The percentages for houses and condos are still extraordinarily high. This statistic is one of the clearest measures of supply and demand.

Average Days on Market

For those listings that did accept offers in September, the average days on market was the lowest in a long while. Many new listings, especially those considered most appealing and well-priced, are accepting offers within 7 to 10 days of coming on market.

Posted on

Supply/Demand: Does it predict price? Maybe not.

Now hold on there, matie!  Basic economic theory  says more supply than demand, prices will fall, right?  Well take a look at this graph. It shows the absorption rate of single family home listings from January 2006 through December 2008 plotted against median prices (click to make it bigger):

absorption-price-chart1

“Absorption” is basically the number of weeks it would take to sell all the homes available on the market based on the number of homes that are selling at that time.  (I’ve tweaked the formula to diminish the spikes caused by the huge seasonal dropoff in new listings each December/January.)   There are many ways to calculate absorption, but the basic idea is simply to capture how quickly demand is eating supply.  Less time to absorb the supply should reflect a “hotter” market where sellers can demand top dollar. A higher absorption rate, on the other hand, means that there’s relatively more listings on the market than demand for them.  That would tend to suggest a buyer’s market and softer prices.

In the chart above, we’d expect to see  median prices rising when the Absorption Rate line falls and median prices falling as the Absorption Rate line rises.  ie. an inverse correlation.

Well, I’ve looked at this chart long and hard and I just don’t see those lines moving that way at all.  In fact I’ve looked at similar data as far back as 2002 and the only thing that’s clear is that people forget about buying or selling a home at the end of the year. Look at 2006:  the market got tighter but prices stayed pretty flat. In 2007, stuff was being absorbed more slowly (the red line goes up), but prices went up anyway.  In 2008, you’d think that with only two weeks of supply available, home prices would be skyrocketing.  Obviously that aint happenin’.

I’m not an economist or a statistician, but I did get my dear wife, who eats statistics for breakfast, to check my methodology.  I think these results are quite counter-intuitive.  Here are the explanations I can think of.  Please chime in with your own:

  • If you cut off the peaks and troughs, the Absorption Rate  mostly stays within a band of around 4 to 7 weeks.   That suggests that supply/demand in San Francisco is actually pretty stable.  And that in turn suggests that something else must be driving prices.  Note, for example, that my chart  doesn’t reflect the number of offers that are made on any particular house.  There might be 10 offers on a house, but at the end of the day just one house gets sold.  Anyone who was playing during the frenzies of 2005 – 2007 doesn’t need to be told how multiple offers affect price, but that sort of demand isn’t reflected in an absoprtion rate.
  • Relatively speaking, San Francisco is not a stressed market.  Supply/demand is not hugely out of whack.  Foreclosures are not piling up (yet).  Under these circumstances, prices are “sticky.”  They don’t react quickly to changes in demand.  If people don’t get the price they want, what do they do?  They don’t sell unless they really have to.  And SF home-owners tend to be people who don’t have to sell.  More on this in another post.
  • The price increases of the last few years and their recent tumble may are probably most directly attributable to one thing, pure and simple:  easy money.  That aint gonna show up on this graph either.

Conclusion:  “Absorption”  isn’t a good measure of supply/demand.

So is there any other metric that correlates more closely with changes in price?  How about the famous “DOM” — Days on Market.  This is how long a property takes to go from being listed to being sold.  The theory goes that when properties sell quickly the market is “hot.”  Why do properties sell quickly?  Probably because … there’s more demand than supply.  ie.  More people making offers, more people getting the loans they need, more people willing to waive inspection contingencies and buy “as is” just to get the deal done.  So maybe DOM actually does capture those muliple offers where the Absorption Rate just doesn’t.

So will DOM tell us how “hot” the market is and where prices are headed?  Or is DOM dumb.  Stay tuned….